13 Dec 2010
Spookers - school holiday fun for the kids?
For several years I had promised my son a visit to Spookers, a horror-themed park in Karaka in the grounds of the former Kingseat Psychiatric Hospital.
Moreover, I had wanted to research Spookers for stigma associated with “mental illness”. The occasion came for both when he and his friends arranged a 16th birthday event there.
I tried not to be the killjoy that they were expecting. I even bought the giant hypodermic needle in the souvenir shop, and the hypodermic-needle pen to show my participation in the theatre of it all. But I’m a little ashamed of my part in perpetuating stigmatising myths. All I can do is try to debate the ethics of the place.
Immediately, the link between the old asylum and “mental patient” is obvious, the context of the former institution makes this inevitable. The site entrance increases the tension with its uncannily familiar long driveway and tree-lined avenue, and the villas on either side. Decades of images of institutions are well-known to us through popular culture.
The entrance further evokes the monolithic institution. Here a dishevelled man sits muttering and looking threateningly at people queuing for tickets, his brain-surgery scar visible on his shaved head. He shuffles on his haunches and sits menacingly close, mumbling, drooling, and crouching with an ape-like, skulking demeanour. He shouts and pounces when people forget he is there.
Very large actors (I think they were actors) splattered with blood and ripped clothing chase and shriek at you through claustrophobic, paint-peeling concrete hallways. The labyrinth of corridors and doors, and wider “communal areas” all communicate institutions, hospitals, prisons, and asylums.
This visit confirmed for me that stigma associated with “mental illness” is re-emerging, alongside a dominant bio-medical approach to mental health. This parallels the resurrection of the “escaped mental patient” storyline in media and popular culture.
These images both exacerbate and confirm ideas of “genetic fault” and work to corroborate “evidence” of dangerous sickness, crime and malingering.
Does Spookers reflect society’s fears and prejudices, or does it add to them?
The “escaped mental patient” character threatens unpredictable violence and cruelty, and is represented here in living colour and volume. This adds to, and derives from, the “monster” public enemy in media, movies, and television. Spookers further affirms proposed links between violent crime and mental illness. Never mind proof to the contrary.
So did I enjoy myself? You bet; I love Gothic horror and have studied its stylistics and codings, in art and literature for the last 15 years. Spookers was fun in a “camp”, theatrical way; this is my dilemma.
I was saddened by the associations the old Kingseat Hospital affords, and that the attraction trades on people’s misfortunes. It abuses Kingseat’s notorious past and infamous history. I feel for the suffering and loss these places cause. If it were in an industrial area or other large commercial building on the fringe of town, Spookers would be less offensive to the memory of those who lived and died in Kingseat.
On the flipside, Spookers does serve the function, as Halloween horror often does, of laughing in the face of death, to make mock of our superstitions and irrational fears, to whistle in the dark of our unconscious fears. Right now, it serves the primal need to find scapegoats for a new generation who are ignorant of the asylum origin of the “escaped mental patient monster” from the past.
Dean Manley, National Manager, Like Minds, Like Mine
